I found Unraveling the “Model Minority” Stereotype
fascinating. Though logically I know that not all immigrants from Asia are the
same, I had falsely assumed that Asian American was an appropriate term. At the
beginning of the novel, Lee describes how she was unaware of the cliques that
existed and how many of the teachers are the school were still unaware of the
student’s preference: “…several teachers informed me that the Asian American
students had split themselves into two groups: Koreans in one and all other
Asians in another” (Lee 667). Lee discovered that there were actually four
distinct groups: Korean-identified, Asian-identified, Asian
American-identified, and New Wave Asian-identified. By spending time immersing
herself in the students’ lives, she is able to see that they do not see
themselves the way others do. It was disappointing that the teachers at
Academic High did not spend enough time with their students to realize that
they identified themselves differently than society identified them.
I found the mentalities
behind each identity to be the most interesting element of the novel. The
Korean-identified students placed themselves above all other Asian students and
certain non-Asian students: “Underlying conversations regarding Korean
difference and superiority was a conversation about social class” (Lee 707). I
found it shocking that Koreans wanted to distance themselves so much from other
Asians and anyone who were perceived as a lower class. They were deeply averse
to anyone who was on public assistance or welfare as if it was a contagious disease.
They frequently expressed elitist attitudes about who they deemed worthy enough
to include in their social circles or even conversations. They purposely sought
out relationships with white students so that they could learn and imitate
their behavior. Their parents encouraged them to become assimilated and to
climb the ladder of social class through success.
The Korean-identified
students’ attitudes made me realize that the stereotypes and racist attitudes
do not solely exist outside of a targeted group. Even among ethnically linked
groups there is racism and damaging attitudes that promote the continuation of
hurtful stereotypes. The Korean-identified students promoted the model minority
stereotype because they believed it gave them an edge in American society. This
attitude may have been perpetuated from their parents and the fact that most
Korean immigrants come from wealthy or educated backgrounds. Each group had a
specific attitude toward the other Asian groups. Some were racist or
stereotypical attitudes while others were supportive. More often than not, the
damaging attitudes persist between groups while the supportive attitudes
disintegrate.
I also found it surprising how much judgement and racism was evident between the different sub-groups of Asian Americans in Academic High. I'm glad that you mentioned this, because before reading your post I didn't realize that I was falsely assuming that racism would foster unity within overarching racial groups. It seems apparent from Lee's observations that the opposite is often true instead.
ReplyDeleteThis realization makes it much more intuitively obvious that supposedly positive stereotypes, such as the model minority stereotype, can be just as detrimental as the negative stereotypes are. It is sad to see how stereotypes seem to force people to take sides. As you point out, a large part of the divide is clearly rooted in socioeconomic differences, but we as a society clearly need to be more careful about the labels we place on each other as well as on ourselves.